The Churchill Bust
This site revolves around a
letter sent to British government offices on
Been pottering with the site since 20/10/2004
Welcome Peace Lovers
Look at him. He doesn’t know about religion, power, or oil, but he does know Love.
nThis site is dedicated to every new born baby in the world; in recognition of the horror that millions suffer whilst George Bush and Osama Bin Laden amongst others write themselves into the history books.
Unlike most anti-war sites we look forward to debate. We encourage those that disagree with this campaign to email their disapproval. Letters with less than 1000 words maybe published on this site.
This site is actively campaigning for the return of Epstein's bust of Winston Churchill which was loaned to President George W Bush by Prime Minister Tony Blair on 16th of July 2001.
Winston Churchill, we aim to show, has been used to justify the wholesale exportation of war. The bust is seen as symbolic of Bush's obsession with Churchill; an obsession which is manipulated for the purpose of justifying death and suffering throughout the world.
With a good few revelations this site touches on politics, art, religion, and history.
The whole site revolves around a letter which was sent to the Government Art Collection (GAC) offices in London, on the 20th of October 2004. It aims to put the case.
Site editor - firstname.lastname@example.org
If you have an anti-war web site you could join web ring directory at
Anti-war campaigners are a diverse bunch, why not swap links?
Copyright due to misrepresentation. This site hopes to provide a focus for argument. It is a site where I hope those who disagree justify why? Claims by parties of any kind that want to take action of any kind against this site are hereby declared obsolete on the grounds that from all the evidence that has been available to me , from every source, what I have said is true. The only legal recourse available to anybody who disagrees with what I say is to check the facts and reply. Full replies may be published on this site in less than 1000 words.
Why Blair should go now.
When the UN declared the war in Iraq illegal. The British Prime Minister ultimately became a War Crimes suspect. A suspect that currently selects which Human Rights he will adhere too.
I don't get it. If Tony Blair is a war crimes suspect what gives him the right to dictate what he will do and when he will leave office?
If MP's on all sides refuse to rock the Bush/Blair boat; either for career reasons or national unity; who is representing the enormous amount of people that detest this relationship?
Shouldn't war crimes suspects be on trial not in office; If for nothing else than to prove there innocence.